Abstract
The aim of this paper is twofold: to investigate people's response on building repair and retrofit, and to identify the impediments of limited response in a case historical village Shangli located in disaster-prone mountainous area. The conclusions are as follows. Firstly, the local people were unsatisfied with the limited disaster resistance of their buildings. However, their repair and retrofit activities were limited. Three-quarters of the damaged buildings were not repaired or just partly repaired. Moreover, disaster-resistant retrofit was not seriously considered; two-thirds of the buildings were simply reinforced, mostly by the owners in the process of repair. Secondly, the buildings built before 1981, the wooden and wooden–brick buildings, and those severely damaged, were repaired less, comparing with buildings built after 1980, modern building types of confined-brick and reinforced concrete, and slightly or moderately damaged buildings. Thirdly, the impediments to the repair and retrofit activities were limited access to building technology, the administrative licensing problem, and impediment to decision-making due to property right subdivision. Fourthly, the repair activities on the buildings built before 1981 were particularly impeded by the administrative licensing problem.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.