Abstract

BackgroundThe treatment of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes involves surgery to close the hole. Some surgeons advise patients to adopt a face-down position to increase the likelihood of successful macular hole closure. However, patients often find the face-down positioning arduous. There is a lack of conclusive evidence that face-down positioning improves the outcome. The ‘Positioning In Macular hole Surgery’ (PIMS) trial will assess whether advice to position face-down after surgery improves the surgical success rate for the closure of large (≥400 μm) macular holes.Methods/designThe PIMS trial is a multicentre, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial with 1:1 randomisation. Patients (n = 192) with macular holes (≥400 μm) will be randomised after surgery to either face-down positioning or face-forward positioning for at least 8 h (which can be either consecutive or nonconsecutive) a day, for 5 days following surgery. Inclusion criteria are: presence of an idiopathic full-thickness macular hole ≥400 μm in diameter, as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans, on either or both eyes; patients electing to have surgery for a macular hole, with or without simultaneous phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implant; ability and willingness to position face-down or in an inactive face-forward position; a history of visual loss suggesting a macular hole of 12 months’ or less duration. The primary outcome is successful macular hole closure at 3 months post surgery. The treatment effect will be reported as an odds ratio with 95% confidence interval, adjusted for size of macular hole and phakic lens status at baseline. Secondary outcome measures at 3 months are: further surgery for macular holes performed or planned (of those with unsuccessful closure); patient-reported experience of positioning; whether patients report they would still have elected to have the operation given what they know at follow-up; best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured using Snellen charts at a standard distance of 6 m; patient-reported health and quality of life assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25).DiscussionThe PIMS trial is the first multicentre randomised control trial to investigate the value of face-down positioning following macular hole standardised surgery.Trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number registry, ID: ISRCTN12410596. Registered on 11 February 2015.United Kingdom Clinical Research Network, ID: UKCRN17966. Registered on 26 November 2014.

Highlights

  • The treatment of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes involves surgery to close the hole

  • The Positioning In Macular hole Surgery’ (PIMS) trial is the first multicentre randomised control trial to investigate the value of face-down positioning following macular hole standardised surgery

  • Purpose and scope of statistical analysis plan (SAP) The aim of this paper is to report, in detail, the planned analyses that were approved by the Trial Steering Committee for the principal research for the PIMS (Positioning In Macular hole Surgery) trial, a multicentre, interventional, comparative, randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down with face-forward positioning on the outcome for surgery for large macular holes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The treatment of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes involves surgery to close the hole. Some surgeons advise patients to adopt a face-down position to increase the likelihood of successful macular hole closure. Patients often find the face-down positioning arduous. There is a lack of conclusive evidence that face-down positioning improves the outcome. The ‘Positioning In Macular hole Surgery’ (PIMS) trial will assess whether advice to position face-down after surgery improves the surgical success rate for the closure of large (≥400 μm) macular holes. Idiopathic macular holes (macular holes) cause patients’ central vision to be blurred or distorted. Macular holes can be treated surgically by removing the vitreous gel from the eye (vitrectomy), peeling off the ILM and injection of a temporary gas bubble into the back of the eye. Surgery is deemed successful when the macular hole is fully closed. Patients are understandably confused and distressed by uncertainty and inconsistent advice

Objectives
Findings
Methods
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.