POSB9 Short- and Long-Term Performance of Mechanical Versus Biological Prostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis over 65 Years

D Pérez,L Maroto,J Cobiella,L Montero,B Torres,M Carnero,B Marti Sanchez,A Diaz,J Cuervo

doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.119

POSB9 Short- and Long-Term Performance of Mechanical Versus Biological Prostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis over 65 Years

D Pérez, L Maroto + Show 7 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.119

Copy DOI

Journal: Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research	Publication Date: Jan 1, 2022
License type: elsevier-specific: oa user license

Affiliation: Hospital Clínico San Carlos, GMV Innovating Solutions (Spain)

#Prostheses For Aortic Valve Replacement #Aortic Valve Replacement In Patients + Show 8 more

Abstract
Full-Text PDF
Similar Papers

Abstract

Latest clinical guidelines recommend biological prostheses as a reasonable choice in patients ≥65 years requiring aortic valve replacement (AVR). The aim is to compare clinical outcomes (major adverse events survival at short and long term) and resource-consumption (health resources, anticoagulation rates and post-surgery length of stay in ward -LoS- and intensive care unit -ICU-) between mechanical (MAVI) and biological aortic valve implants (BAVI) in AVR.

Full Text