Methods for Measuring and Valuing Informal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Stroke

Abstract

ObjectivesTo accurately capture informal care in healthcare evaluations, rigorous approaches are required to measure and value this important care component. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we intended to summarize the current methods of measuring and valuing informal care costs in healthcare evaluations (full and partial healthcare evaluations, including cost of illness and cost analysis) in stroke. MethodsA systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, EconLit, and CINAHL. We used EndNote 20, Research Screener, and Covidence platforms for screening and data extraction. A meta-analysis was performed on informal care hours, and a subgroup meta-analysis was conducted based on stroke severity. ResultsA total of 31 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. There was variation among the studies in the informal care measurement and valuation approaches. The meta-analysis of studies where data on informal care hours were available showed an estimate of informal care hours of 25.76 per week (95% CI 13.36-38.16) with a high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.97%). The overall risk of bias in the studies was assessed as low. ConclusionsStandardizing the measurement and valuation of informal care costs is essential for improving the consistency and comparability of economic evaluations. Pilot studies that incorporate standardized informal care cost valuation methods can help identify any practical challenges and capture the impact of informal care more accurately.