Key Issues of Economic Evaluations for Health Technology Assessment in China: A Nationwide Expert Survey

Abstract

ObjectivesHealth technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly crucial in medicine price negotiations in China, yet prior appraisals revealed national discrepancies on key economic evaluation issues: willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold, pricing models for multi-indication medicines, and comparator selection principles. This study aims to collect expert opinions on these issues for future HTA evaluations. MethodsA nationwide anonymous web-based survey encompassing experts across academia, HTA, consultancy/contract research organization (CRO)/industry, service provider and payer. In 2023, a generic invitation containing a web link to the questionnaire was disseminated via WeChat using convenience and snowball sampling. Agreement rates for questionnaire views were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The relationship between participants' responses and demographics was examined using appropriate logistic models. Results303 responses were received from experts in 34 cities. Key expert views include: a suggested base WTP threshold ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 times GDP (52.1% agreement); elevated thresholds for childhood diseases, rare diseases, end-of-life diseases, and first-in-class medicines (FICs) (>78.0% agreement); a single pricing model for multi-indication medicines (60.4% agreement); consideration of multiple medicines as comparators (79.9% agreement); and avoiding the use of centrally procured medicines as comparators for medicines with a time-to-market under three years (71.0% agreement). Participants who are service provider had lower odds of selecting higher thresholds (OR: 0.26; P<0.01) compared with responders from consultancy/CRO/industry. ConclusionsExpert views indicate the need for substantial changes in China's current HTA methods, highlighting the need for increased investment in HTA processes and expertise cultivation.