Abstract
This paper examines the robustness of the evidence on rebalancing effects within Hong Kong context and addresses the issue of whether there is an optimal rebalancing strategy that can be historically exploited by wealth managers to earn constant profits in excess of a buy-and-hold strategy in the market index. It finds that although superior to buy-and-hold, no single rebalancing strategy dominates one another under all conditions. The general rule is that patient rather than quick-trigger rebalancing benefits portfolio management. In particular, the superiority of rebalancing mainly comes from market conditions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.