Abstract

Vincristine (VCR) is frequently used in pediatric oncology and can be administered intravenously through push injections or 1 h infusions. The effects of administration duration on population pharmacokinetics (PK) are unknown. We described PK differences related to administration duration and the relation between PK and VCR-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN). PK was assessed in 1–5 occasions (1–8 samples in 24 h per occasion). Samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Population PK of VCR and its relationship with administration duration was determined using a non-linear mixed effect. We estimated individual post-hoc parameters: area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) in the plasma and peripheral compartment. VIPN was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and the pediatric-modified total neuropathy score (ped-mTNS). Overall, 70 PK assessments in 35 children were evaluated. The population estimated that the intercompartmental clearance (IC-Cl), volume of the peripheral compartment (V2), and Cmax were significantly higher in the push group. Furthermore, higher IC-Cl was significantly correlated with VIPN development. Administration of VCR by push led to increased IC-Cl, V2, and Cmax, but were similar to AUC, compared to 1 h infusions. Administration of VCR by 1 h infusions led to similar or higher exposure of VCR without increasing VIPN.

Highlights

  • Vincristine (VCR) is a frequently used chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of several types of pediatric malignancies [1]

  • 35 out of 90 patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and participated in the PK studies

  • PK measurements were performed on 70 different occasions (1–5 per patient), which resulted in a total of 425 samples

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vincristine (VCR) is a frequently used chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of several types of pediatric malignancies [1]. It works by inhibiting mitosis [2,3], and VCR is primarily eliminated by metabolism in the liver via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 [4]. Previous studies investigating the relationship between VCR PK and toxicity showed conflicting results, with some studies indicating that there is no association between PK and VCR-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) [6,8,11,12], the major dose-limiting toxicity of VCR, whereas others did report this association [1,13,14]. Inflammatory processes seem to play a role in the pathophysiology of VIPN

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.