Abstract

Analysis of changes in the population immunity level in adults for more than 20 Russian cities, collaborating with the Federal Center for Influenza, to circulating influenza viruses A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2) and B in the period from 2009 to 2015 performed. By the beginning of the pandemic (October 2009) the population of Russia was almost seronegative to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus. After the pandemia first wave mean geometric titers (GMT)s of antibodies to the pandemic virus increased by 2.6 times, after the second one by 4.9 times in comparison with initial GMT (1:5.5). A consistent increase in GMTs antibody after each of the subsequent seasons of active circulation of pandemic virus was observed reaching the maximum (1:41) by April 2013, after the next epidemic caused by this virus. The proportion of people with protective antibody titers in October 2009 to already started circulating influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus was 8.2%, to influenza A(H3N2) virus — 58.3%, and influenza B virus — 59.7%. Level of population immunity in adults to seasonal influenza A(H3N2) and B viruses throughout the observed period was significantly higher than to influenza virus A(H1N1)pdm09. The percentage of persons with protective antibody titers during the observed period varied for virus A(H3N2) in the range from 58.3 to 75.5%, for influenza B virus — from 59.7 to 82.3%. Accordingly, incidence rate for ILI and ARI in adult groups the population during influenza epidemic caused by these pathogens was lower than in the epidemics, associated with active circulation of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus. The data obtained can be used in influenza forecasting for the upcoming season regarding the etiology and the expected epidemic intensity need for the relevant preventing measures development to decrease the burden from influenza.

Highlights

  • Analysis of changes in the population immunity level in adults for more than 20 Russian cities, collaborating with the Federal Center for Influenza, to circulating influenza viruses A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2) and B in the period from 2009 to 2015 performed

  • After the pandemia first wave mean geometric titers (GMT)s of antibodies to the pandemic virus increased by 2.6 times, after the second one by 4.9 times in comparison with initial GMT (1:5.5)

  • A consistent increase in GMTs antibody after each of the subsequent seasons of active circulation of pandemic virus was observed reaching the maximum (1:41) by April 2013, after the epidemic caused by this virus

Read more

Summary

Оригинальные статьи

РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ МНОГОЛЕТНЕГО ИЗУЧЕНИЯ ПОПУЛЯЦИОННОГО ИММУНИТЕТА К ВИРУСАМ ГРИППА A(H1N1)pdm, A(H3N2) И В У ВЗРОСЛОГО НАСЕЛЕНИЯ РОССИИ. Проведен анализ изменений уровня популяционного иммунитета трудоспособного взрослого населения более 20 городов России, сотрудничающих с Федеральным центром по гриппу, к циркулирующим вирусам гриппа A(H1N1)pdm, A(H3N2) и B в период с 2009 по 2015 гг. Доля лиц с защитными титрами антител (ЗТА) к уже начавшему циркулировать вирусу гриппа А(H1N1)pdm в октябре 2009 г. Уровень популяционного иммунитета у взрослых к возбудителям сезонных эпидемий — вирусам гриппа A(H3N2) и В и в дальнейшем, на протяжении всего наблюдаемого периода, был достоверно выше, чем к вирусу гриппа A(H1N1)pdm. Соответственно, показатели заболеваемости взрослого населения в эпидемии гриппа, вызванные этими возбудителями были ниже, чем в эпидемии, связанные с активной циркуляцией вируса A(H1N1)pdm. POPULATION IMMUNITY TO INFLUENZA VIRUS A(H1N1)pdm, A(H3N2) AND B IN THE ADULT POPULATION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION LONG-TERM RESEARCH RESULTS.

Материалы и методы
Популяционный иммунитет к вирусам гриппа protective AT
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.