Abstract

The philosophy of Karl Popper was strongly used by the cladists in their battle against evolutionary and numerical taxonomy. It became known as “Systematics Wars” by David Hull. His historical account in Science as a Process, described the outcome of that era that end up with the victory of cladistics. Claiming it as hypothetico-deductivist, and falsificationist, cladists have transformed and distorted Popper, that almost nothing of these ideas survived scrutiny. One of the Hull’s conclusion was that the success of cladistics was largely due to their ability to maintain social cohesion and intellectual orthodoxy during the years of the Systematic Wars. In this paper, I will provide a concise historical development about the appropriation of Popper’s ideas that were used by systematics, both as a defense and as a critic, trying to make clear the interpretations of these authors in relation to Popper and their research program. Using David Hull’s General Theory of Selection Processes, I will argue that these facts were, partially, to a heavy adherence to Popper’s philosophy.

Highlights

  • The importance David Hull (1935‐2010) has to the Philosophy of Biology is huge

  • We can see the essential influence of Popper for the success and the supremacy of cladistics by winning the “science wars” that led to the demise of numerical tax‐ onomy and evolutionary systematics (Rieppel, 2008b)

  • In the 70’s and 80’s it was a very important social cohesion factor among the cladists, being used as support against, mainly, the numerical taxonomists, that ended up falling in the ostracism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

He is cited as “the person most responsible for the philosophy of biology achieving the status within philosophy that it has today He is the single figure most re‐ sponsible for its flourishing. His importance for the develop‐ ment and maturation to the philosophy of cladists is very representative This can be exemplified by giving two, rather different in approaches, cita‐ tions, “David Hull (in lit., 12/22/02) recounts how early in the ‘cladistic revolution’, Gary Nelson and Norman Platnick from the American Museum of Natural History asked him to suggest a self-con‐ tained book on the philosophy of science. His suggestion was Popper. Rieppel (2008b, p. 297); David Hull, perhaps the first to identify the bul‐ ly-boy tactics in systematics... (Williams & Ebach, 2013, p. 178)”

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call