Abstract
The main goal of communication is to try to apply some theoretical suggestions of the epistemological holism to the area of judicial balancing between constitutional principles and rights. A coherentist and contextual conception of knowledge could offer, in the field of legal interpretation, theoretical suggestions to understand that a wider or narrower margin of normative indeterminacy is, in a certain sense, physiologic in a context of persistent conflict like the one characterizing contemporary constitutional States.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
