Abstract

This research focused on an electrical improvement of polymer nanocomposite which had potential for application in dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). This composite polymer electrolyte can be prepared by admicellar polymerization to form a core‐shell structure. The shell was prepared by acrylic acid (AA) monomer copolymerization with modified silica from trimethoxysilyl propyl methacrylate monomer (MPS) and hydrophilic silica (R200) (MPS‐SiO2) and then coated on natural rubber (NR) as a core (PAA‐adp‐NR co MPS‐SiO2). At 1.5 wt% MPS‐SiO2, the ionic conductivity of PAA‐adp‐NR co MPS‐SiO2 was improved from 0.769 mS cm−1 of PAA‐adp‐NR to 0.931 mS cm−1, and showed the lowest charge transfer resistance (Rct) at 2.065 ohm. Moreover, the current density (Jsc) and conversion efficiency (η) were 11.792 mA/cm2 and 3.485%, respectively. In the case of thermal stress stability, Jsc of PAA‐adp‐NR co MPS‐SiO2 (1.5 wt% MPS‐SiO2) was better than PAA‐adp‐NR. Jsc of PAA‐adp‐NR decreased 40.58% from its original value while Jsc of PAA‐adp‐NR co MPS‐SiO2 (1.5 wt% MPS‐SiO2) decreased 35.71% from its original value at 4 days with a slower rate than PAA‐adp‐NR. η of PAA‐adp‐NR co MPS‐SiO2 (1.5 wt% MPS‐SiO2) remained 6.67% of its original value at 28 days while η values of liquid electrolytes and PAA‐adp‐NR were close to zero. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:304–314, 2019. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.