Abstract

Through a multiple case study covering two Indian microfinance organizations, it is demonstrated how organizations resolve the politician’s dilemma (Kraatz & Block, 2008) in a pluralistic context. The researcher elaborates on how organizations adopting a divergent institutional logic face the dilemma of attending to both the problems of commitment and conformity. He endeavours to uncover the “commitment problem” in institutional pluralism and subsequently address the issue of politician’s dilemma. He suggests that an organization maneuvers through the dilemma by constructing a new organizational identity and this is followed by complimentary organizational structure. This research is a contribution to the literature on institutional pluralism by arguing that interplay between conformity and commitment cannot be resolved merely through decoupling, and organizations need to take into account the negotiability of legitimacy sources.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.