Abstract

This is the last of three articles discussing concept formation in our field. The first concentrates on concept formation in general and highlights the role of definitions. The second article is more specific. It deals with David Easton’s well-known definition of politics as “authoritative allocation of values”. In this third and final paper the definitional modes of six different approaches are examined. The question, once again, is how formal aspects of defining combine with substantive images of Homo politicus. There is no simple conclusion, of course, because the examples analysed are highly diverse. They range from “subjectivist” approaches like discursive-constructivism all the way to “objectivist” approaches like empirical naturalism. Small wonder that different combinations of formal and substantive considerations prevail. Typical and atypical, tight and loose, soft and hard attributes combine in various ways. And, as is to be expected, the interrelation with political images varies, too.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.