Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze policy competition and conflict behaviors by policy types in Korean local governments. This paper answers three research questions. First, what causal conditions influence policy adoption in Korean local governments? The configurations of policy determinants are examined by a fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). Second, what are different causal conditions for policy types? By Peterson’s three policy types, causal configurations of each type are compared. Third, which conditions do affect the time lag of policy adoption in Korean local governments? The time lag of policy adoption among the three policies is estimated, and the causal conditions are compared among them. For the analysis, pooled time series data are generated by combining the data sets between 2003 and 2012. The results show that the causal combinations of the policy adoption are as follows: developmental policy adoption is affected by political factors and economic characteristics influence redistributive policy adoption. Allocational policy adoption reflects both socioeconomic and political aspects. In the time lag analysis, local governments adopt policies in order of allocational, redistributive and developmental policies. The results partially agree with Peterson’s scheme and show the various configurative explanations for policy adoption by systematic comparisons of the adoption behaviors of each policy type in Korean local governments.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.