Abstract

Developing countries have very limited resources for procurement and management of medical devices. Usually, the resources that they do have, however, are not used in appropriate and optimal ways. Initial results of a study, supported by NUFFIC and conducted in Benin, are reported, identifying factors that adversely affect the healthcare technology management cycle of planning, budgeting, selection, procurement, distribution, installation, training, operation, maintenance and disposal of medical devices. Poor device management results in low overall community health effectiveness. The study included surveys using semi-structured interviews with policy makers from the Ministries of Health and Finance and Economy, health facility managers, equipment users, maintenance technicians, managers of medical device companies and representatives of external support agencies. Key factors identified so far include: high acquisition costs; lack of insight of the government on medical device market prices; lacks of capacity to monitor reasonable prices from suppliers; lack of insight in the cost/performance ratio of various brands of medical devices; an unequal distribution of devices among health care facilities; an unbalanced allocation of resources for acquisition of devices; infrastructure, and maintenance. Other key factors included the insufficiency of human resources with appropriate capacity to manage the equipment, the unavailability of spare parts, and the lack of an annual maintenance budget. In a nutshell, the lack of good medical devices national policy and management practice. Preliminary results will be presented, starting with a list of essential equipment and of reference prices for the most widely used devices. The latter will allow health sector authorities to monitor financial diversion that may occur during procurement activities, while the former will serve as a reference to assess availability of fully operational devices at different health care facilities. The project aims to provide a basis for the development of basic legislation, empowering the Benin government to assure more cost-effective use of its resources for medical devices. For a variety of reasons, the potential benefits associated with the use of medical devices purchased for the public health care sector of Benin are not fully realized. To improve upon the current situation, the magnitude of the problem and its contributory causes should be examined more systematically. Existing tools, such as value-based pricing, development of an essential medical devices list and technology assessment may be used, but should be tailored to the specific context of the country. Participatory approaches are more likely to produce more sustained effects than simple regulations. (7 pages)

Highlights

  • Health technology, according to WHO is the application of organized knowledge and skills in the form of devices, medicine, vaccines, procedures and systems development to solve a health problem and improve quality of lives4

  • This study focused on the procurement management of medical devices in the Republic of Benin and aimed to identify the main weak points in the procurement management system of medical devices from 1998 to 2008

  • It was based on data collected from documents, and on interviews and informal discussions with ten local accredited suppliers of medical devices in Benin

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Health technology, according to WHO is the application of organized knowledge and skills in the form of devices, medicine, vaccines, procedures and systems development to solve a health problem and improve quality of lives. In Benin, medical devices and equipment represent a significant proportion of national health care expenditure. More than 10,600,000 US$, (about 20%) of the national health budget, are spent on procurement of medical devices and equipment for healthcare facilities. Policy and Management of Medical Devices for the Public Health Care Sector in Benin Indicators. Population in 2006 Human Development Index Country rank GPD per capita (Purchasing Power Parity US$) Life expectancy at birth (years) Public expenditure on health (% of GPD) in 2004 Health expenditure per capita (PPP US$) in 2004 Infant mortality rate per 1,000 live births Maternal mortality ratio per 100,000 live births HIV/AIDS prevalence (%) Adult literacy rate (% ages 15 and older).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call