Abstract

BackgroundPolicies for health technologies such as medical devices are essential and contribute to improved quality of healthcare. The regulation, assessment, and management represent important functions of medical devices. Insufficiently developed interactions between these functions impact the quality of delivered healthcare. To date studies lack to analyse these functions in a broad way. The aim of this study is to analyse the regulation, assessment, and management of orthopaedic medical devices in Mexico and how they shape healthcare.MethodsThis qualitative study included 42 stakeholders involved directly or indirectly in the regulation, assessment, or management for orthopaedic medical devices in Mexico.ResultsThe fragmentation of responsibilities for medical device functions may be a central aspect of our findings concerning challenges reported by interviewees. Strengthening technovigilance based on improved reporting across health care institutions emerged as pathway to improve medical device regulation. With regard to improving the medical device assessment, a comprehensive update of the standard list represents a relevant opportunity. Integrating advanced quality attributes into procurement processes regarding decision-making, purchasing strategy, and procurement agent is needed to fostering the management.ConclusionsThis study provides a broad analysis of medical device functions within a health system and highlights in this specific context how improvements might be achieved. It addresses a broad range of interest groups represented by policy makers, health service providers, managers and administrators of healthcare facilities, and doctors with an interest in health technologies. In this paper we highlight important themes that influence outputs and outcomes of the regulation, assessment, and management and discuss strategies in fostering these areas. To date, the regulation, assessment, and management of medical devices are rarely analysed in a broad way, even though these functions importantly contribute to the successful implementation of health technology policies. The quality of delivered healthcare is influenced by the performance between and within these functions. In Mexico, little discussion has been raised on challenges of the regulation, assessment, and management of medical devices. Changes to current processes and practices can improve outputs and outcomes of these functions and positively influence the quality of delivered healthcare. Stakeholder involvement and commitment is essential to this.

Highlights

  • Policies for health technologies such as medical devices are essential and contribute to improved quality of healthcare

  • Our research approach is based on a working framework (Fig. 1), which is guided by two considerations: (i) Medical Device Life-Cycle (MDLC) represents key functions for medical devices and as a whole it is a functional system contributing to improved health, and (ii) important stakeholders related to the MDLC exert their influence at the macro level, meso level, and micro level

  • This study provides a broad analysis of medical device functions within a health system and highlights in this specific context how improvements might be achieved

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Policies for health technologies such as medical devices are essential and contribute to improved quality of healthcare. The aim of this study is to analyse the regulation, assessment, and management of orthopaedic medical devices in Mexico and how they shape healthcare. Mexico is one of these countries and has established several government agencies (Table 1) and defined regulations that support policies for health technologies. This is key to organize and support, and strengthen important functions for medical devices. These functions are the regulation, assessment, and management of medical devices and compose important areas of the Medical Device Life-Cycle (MDLC) (Table 2) and support health care delivery at different organizational levels within the health system

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call