Abstract
We show that political polarization among directors negatively impacts corporate board effectiveness by reducing the CEO forced turnover-performance sensitivity. Our results are more pronounced in presidential election years and for firms with more monitoring and advising needs. Polarization also increases the departure likelihood for directors who are ideologically distant from the rest of the board, making boards more politically homogeneous over time. Finally, we show that polarization in the boardroom lowers firms' investment-Q sensitivity and Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) performance. Our findings highlight the real economic cost of political polarization.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call