Polarization Resistance of Ceria-Containing Fuel Electrodes in Solid Oxide Cells Studied By Impedance and DRT Analysis

Abstract

Introduction Solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC), which enables steam electrolysis by reversely operating solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), is capable of highly efficient hydrogen production. Whilst SOFC and SOEC are using similar materials and cell structures, electrode reactions in SOEC operation have to be studied in more details. In our previous study [1], Ni-ScSZ cermet, widely used as SOFC fuel electrodes, exhibited a tendency where electrode resistance increases at a low absolute current density in SOEC operation, while Ni-GDC co-impregnated cells fabricated by the impregnation method exhibited sufficient performance in a wide current density range. Here in this study, various model fuel electrode materials were evaluated and compared in a wide current density range in the SOFC and SOEC modes under the same measurement conditions. Electrode reactions are evaluated through measurements of electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) and subsequent analysis of distribution of relaxation times (DRT). Experimental Three types of cells with different fuel electrodes were prepared: Ni-ScSZ cermet fuel electrode; Ni-GDC cermet fuel electrode; and Ni-GDC co-impregnated fuel electrode. The Ni-GDC cermet fuel electrodes were fabricated using gadolinia-doped ceria (GDC), widely known as a mixed ionic electronic conductor, besides a pure ionic conductor ScSZ. The Ni-GDC co-impregnated cell was fabricated by preparing a composite electrode backbone of GDC and La-doped SrTiO3 (LST), followed by impregnation of the catalyst particles, Ni and GDC. La-Sr-Ti oxides are known to exhibit sufficient stability in both oxidizing and reducing atmospheres [2, 3]. Moreover, co-impregnated fuel electrodes have shown high tolerance against highly-humidified hydrogen fuel and redox durability [4].Electrode resistances were separated into the ohmic resistance and the nonohmic polarization resistance through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Impedance measurements were made by using an impedance analyzer (1255WB, Solartron, UK) in a frequency range between 0.1 Hz and 1 MHz. The fuel, 50%-humidified H2, was supplied to the fuel electrode. The operating temperature was 800 °C. To characterize the electrode processes in both SOFC and SOEC modes, impedance measurements were performed by applying stepwise changes in current density up to ±1.2 A cm-2, for every 0.2 A cm-2. The DRT analysis of the EIS data was performed using a numerical calculation program based on Tikhonov regularization (Z-Assist, Toyo Corporation, Japan) to separate electrochemical processes involved in the electrode reactions. Results and discussion The polarization resistances obtained by the EIS measurements are shown in Fig. 1. The Ni-ScSZ cermet fuel electrode (Fig. 1 (a)) exhibited unique polarization resistance in the SOEC mode. With increasing the absolute value of current density in the SOEC mode, polarization resistance increased significantly at first, reaching a maximum value at -0.4 A cm-2, then decreased. In contrast, for the Ni-GDC cermet fuel electrode (Fig. 1 (b)), polarization resistance increased only slightly with increasing current density in the SOEC mode, and overall polarization resistance remained low. This tendency was also seen for the Ni-GDC co-impregnated fuel electrode (Fig. 1 (c)), where such increase in polarization resistance was further suppressed.Such increase and decrease in polarization resistance observed for the Ni-ScSZ cermet have to be explained by different mechanisms (at least two opposite factors). One possible explanation could be that the reduced and recovered catalytic activity due to e.g. oxidation and reduction of the Ni catalyst surface. The presence of GDC in the fuel electrode has a positive effect reducing the polarization resistance in the SOEC mode. The electrode reaction area may be extended beyond the Ni surface and/or the triple phase boundaries. Furthermore, the Ce ion in ceria undergoes a valence change, which may promote flexible surface exchange reactions, and surface reactions on the Ni catalysts. For the SOEC operation, it will be desirable to clarify the effects of GDC in the r-SOC electrode reactions. Acknowledgments A part of this study was supported by “Research and Development Program for Promoting Innovative Clean Energy Technologies Through International Collaboration” of the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) (Contract No.20001460-0). Collaborative support by Prof. H. L. Tuller, Prof. B. Yildiz, and Prof. J. L. M. Rupp at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is gratefully acknowledged. References N. Endo, T. Fukumoto, R. Ushijima, K. Natsukoshi, Y. Tachikawa, J. Matsuda, S. Taniguchi, and K. Sasaki, ECS Trans., 103(1), 1981 (2021).Q. Ma and F. Tietz, Solid State Ionics, 225, 108 (2012).G. Chen, H. Kishimoto, K. Yamaji, K. Kuramoto, and T. Horita, J. Electrochem. Soc., 162(3), F223 (2014).S. Futamura, A. Muramoto, Y. Tachikawa, J. Matsuda, S. M. Lyth, Y, Shiratori, S. Taniguchi, and K. Sasaki, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 44(16), 8502 (2019). Figure 1