PO-03-135 LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE OCCLUSION VERSUS STANDARD OF CARE IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND A PRIOR THROMBO-EMBOLIC EVENT DESPITE ORAL ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED COMPARISON

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) that suffer from ischemic stroke despite oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy have a very high risk of recurrent stroke and better prevention strategies are needed. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a promising secondary prevention strategy that may provide mechanical protection. However, evidence showing effectiveness of LAAO in this population is scarce and the current international guidelines only consider LAAO in patients with a contra-indication for OAC. To compare percutaneous LAAO to standard-of-care including continuing/switching OAC therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients with AF and a prior thrombo-embolic event and/or LAA thrombus under OAC therapy. The STR-OAC LAAO cohort is an international collaboration of multiple LAAO registries (21 participating centers). All patients that underwent percutaneous LAAO because of a thrombo-embolic event and/or LAA thrombus on OAC were included. Propensity score matching with a previously published multi-center dataset of patients continuing/switching OAC therapy after a thrombo-embolic event was performed to compare the occurence of ischemic stroke between groups.Time-to-event analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-proportional-hazard regression analyses. A total of 425 patients underwent LAAO between 2010-2021 and were included in the STR-OAC LAAO cohort. Mean age was 72±9 years; 45% was female and mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED score were 4.8±1.5 and 2.8±1.2, respectively. Oral anticoagulation was discontinued after LAAO at discharge or after confirmation of adequate LAA closure at 1-3 months follow-up in most patients, the remaining 30% of patients continued OAC after LAAO as an adjunctive strategy. All LAAO patients were propensity-score matched and included in the primary outcome analysis. During follow up including 1450 patient-years a total of 59 patients experienced ischemic stroke: 1.9% per patient-year in LAAO group versus 9.2% per patient-year in the control group. LAAO was associated with a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke (HR 0.3, 95%CI [0.2-0.5], p<0.001) compared to standard-of-care. In this propensity-score matched study, LAAO was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke compared to standard-of-care in patients with a thrombo-embolic event and/or LAA thrombus despite OAC treatment. Randomized controlled trial data may further confirm the effectiveness of LAAO in this very high-risk population.