Abstract
The essay examines the theses presented by Massimo Monteduro in a recent study on “Doveri inderogabili dell’amministrazione e diritti inviolabili della persona”. The author discusses the issues relating to the qualification of the legal duties of the administration under the rule of law. Assuming that the rule of law is a concept in crisis - due to the plurality of sources and the indeterminacy ofthe laws - it is examined to what extent the administration can integrate the legal provisions and fill the gaps in the system in direct implementation of the Constitution. In partial disagreement with Monteduro's thesis, the author highlights how the personalistic principle and art. 2 of the Constitution can be a useful basis for legitimizing the proactive intervention of the administration, while leaving open the problem of combining the centrality of the person and the axiological pluralism of democratic systems
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
