Pleistocene ignimbrites of western Armenia - Paleomagnetic and magnetic anisotropy constraints on flow direction and stratigraphy

Abstract

Voluminous early to middle Pleistocene pyroclastic flow deposits were generated from Mount Aragats (Aragats Volcanic Province, AVP), one of the largest volcanoes in the Arabia-Eurasia continental collision zone. Here we report paleomagnetic results, in combination with anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) analysis, from 31 outcrops belonging to six ignimbrite units of the western part of the AVP (covering an area of more than 5000 km2). Paleomagnetic directional analysis of samples from 26 outcrops of the three younger ignimbrite units yields a well-defined normal polarity direction of D = 339.2°, I = 55.7°, k = 278.4 and α95 = 1.7°. The virtual coincidence of paleomagnetic directions points to an emplacement of the units within a restricted time of similar geomagnetic secular variation (i.e., few hundred years). However, new isotope 40Ar/39Ar ages of the three units suggest two separated events at ~0.65 and ~ 0.75 Ma. The possibility of similar paleomagnetic directions at 0.65 and 0.75 Ma or the occurrence of a widespread remagnetization event at 0.65 Ma cannot be fully excluded, but both scenarios are highly unlikely. In contrast to that, five sites from the three older units show reversed magnetic polarity, which implies an age of emplacement older than the last magnetic polarity reversal at ~780 ka. This agrees with recent 40Ar/39Ar ages of the three older units at ~0.93 Ma. The paleomagnetic scatter of the older units is high compared to the younger ones. Even if paleomagnetic directions and radiometric age are similar, available data cannot unequivocally indicate if the three older units were generated from the same or three different eruptions. The high quality AMS data result in three different types of fabric (lineated, foliated and undetermined) that are all commonly observed in the studied pyroclastic deposits. Accordingly, we use lineation, tilt of foliation, or both for the determination of paleoflow direction. Results reveal a radial flow pattern surrounding Mt. Aragats, which is, however, highly influenced by topographic features, such as valleys, even in proximity of the eruption center.