Abstract
The A. argues that practical reasoning is no worse off than theoretical reasoning, as far as the arbitrariness of its premises goes. Philosophers, unless they are skeptics, are generally not worried about theoretical reasoning being ungrounded. The A. will argue that practical reasoning can avail itself of an analog of belief formation underwritten by observational circumstances, so that practical reasoning has no more cause for embarrassment than theoretical reasoning
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
