Abstract

BackgroundThe WALANT (wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet) technique was based on local infiltration of lidocaine and epinephrine. This technique has rapidly gained popularity in recent years and can perform most hand operations. This study aimed to investigate the time spent on anesthesia and operation and perform an economic analysis among general anesthesia, wrist block with a tourniquet, and the WALANT technique for the internal fixation of metacarpal fractures.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all the single metacarpal fractures managed with the same procedure, open reduction, and internal fixation with the plate between January 2015 and December 2019. They were divided into three groups according to the method of anesthesia: (1) general anesthesia (GA group), (2) wrist block with a tourniquet (WB group), and (3) WALANT technique (WALANT group). We collected and analyzed patient demographic data, perioperative or postoperative complications, number of hospital days, and postoperative functional recovery assessment.ResultsA total of 63 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 24 in the GA group, 28 in the wrist block group using a tourniquet, and 11 in the WALANT group. There were no complications during the operation and follow-up in each group. The GA group had an average of 32.8 min of anesthesia time, significantly longer than the other two groups. However, there is no significant difference regarding surgical time among the presenting three groups. The discomfort of vomiting and nausea after surgery occurred in 20 patients in the GA group (38.1%). Nevertheless, there was no postoperative vomiting and nausea present in both the WB and WALANT groups. Most patients achieved full recovery of pre-injury interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal motion at the final assessment of functional recovery.ConclusionsThe patients undergoing metacarpal fixation surgery under WALANT or WB had significantly less anesthesia time and postoperative vomiting and nausea. Moreover, there was no difference in surgical time and intraoperative complications. The time-related reduction improved the utilization of the operation room for additional cases. The reduction of the preoperative examination, anesthesia fee, postoperative recovery room observation, and hospitalization can effectively reduce medical costs. Furthermore, the WALANT group is more acceptable because of no tourniquet, which commonly causes discomfort.

Highlights

  • The Wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) technique was based on local infiltra‐ tion of lidocaine and epinephrine

  • They were divided into three groups according to the method of anesthesia: (1) general anesthesia (GA group), (2) wrist block with a tourniquet (WB group), and (3) WALANT technique (WALANT group)

  • The patients were divided into three groups: 24 in the General anesthesia (GA) group, 28 in the wrist block group using a tourniquet, and 11 in the WALANT group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The WALANT (wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet) technique was based on local infiltra‐ tion of lidocaine and epinephrine. This technique has rapidly gained popularity in recent years and can perform most hand operations. Donald et al [1, 2] introduced the WALANT (wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet) technique in 2005 based on local infiltration of lidocaine and epinephrine. This combination allows the surgeon to use local anesthetics agents to achieve pain-free surgery. The vasoconstriction effect of epinephrine provides adequate hemostasis in the operative field, eliminating the need for a tourniquet

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call