Abstract
Two methods for measuring plasma alkaline phosphatase activity are compared: one makes use of phenyl phosphate, carbonate-bicarbonate buffer, and continuous-flow methodology; the other of p-nitrophenyl phosphate, diethanolamine buffer, and reaction-rate analysis. Results by the methods correlate well (r = 0.98) over a wide range of values (up to 10-fold the upper limit of normal). A factor can therefore be applied to convert results by one method into those that would be obtained by the other. The possibility that the presence of different proportions of isoenzymes in the plasma will affect this factor is considered. We have used the new method, with a conversion factor, as the routine method of alkaline phosphatase measurement in a clinical chemistry laboratory, with no problems.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
