Abstract
ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the level of coronary inflammation between plaque rupture and plaque erosion using pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation. BackgroundVascular inflammation plays a key role in plaque rupture, while the role of inflammation in plaque erosion remains less well defined. PCAT attenuation determined using computed tomography has emerged as a marker specific for coronary artery inflammation. MethodsPatients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who underwent preintervention coronary computed tomographic angiography and optical coherence tomographic culprit lesion imaging were enrolled. PCAT attenuation was measured around the culprit lesion and in the proximal 40 mm of all coronary arteries. ResultsAmong 198 patients, plaque rupture was the underlying mechanism in 107 (54.0%) and plaque erosion in 91 (46.0%). Plaque rupture had higher PCAT attenuation than plaque erosion both at the culprit plaque level (−65.8 ± 7.5 HU vs −69.5 ± 11.4 HU; P = 0.010) and at the culprit vessel level (−67.1 ± 7.1 HU vs −69.6 ± 8.2 HU; P = 0.024). The mean PCAT attenuation of all 3 coronary arteries was also significantly higher in patients with plaque rupture than in plaque erosion, indicating a higher level of inflammation (−67.9 ± 5.7 HU vs −69.9 ± 6.8 HU; P = 0.030). In multivariable analysis, plaque rupture was significantly associated with high PCAT attenuation. ConclusionsPCAT attenuation in culprit plaque, culprit vessel, and all 3 coronary arteries was higher in plaque rupture than in plaque erosion. The results suggest that pancoronary inflammation plays a more significant role in plaque rupture than in plaque erosion. (Massachusetts General Hospital and Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital Coronary Imaging Collaboration; NCT04523194)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call