Abstract

Plant dispersal syndromes are allocated based on diaspore morphology and used to predict the dominant mechanisms of dispersal. Many authors assume that only angiosperms with endozoochory, epizoochory or anemochory syndromes have a long‐distance dispersal (LDD) mechanism. Too much faith is often placed in classical syndromes to explain historical dispersal events and to predict future ones. What is usually recorded as the ‘endozoochory syndrome' is in reality a ‘frugivory syndrome' and this has often diverted attention from endozoochory by non‐frugivores (e.g. waterbirds and large herbivores) that disperse a broad range of angiosperms, for which they likely provide the maximum dispersal distances. Neither the endozoochory nor the epizoochory syndromes provide helpful predictions of which plants non‐frugivores disperse, or by which mechanism. We combined data from previous studies to show that only 4% of European plant species dispersed by ungulate endozoochory belong to the corresponding syndrome, compared to 36% for ungulate epizoochory and 8% for endozoochory by migratory ducks. In contrast, the proportions of these species that are assigned to an ‘unassisted syndrome' are 37, 31 and 28%, respectively. Since allocated syndromes do not adequately account for zoochory, empirical studies often fail to find the expected relationship between syndromes and LDD events such as those underlying the colonization of islands or latitudinal migration rates. We need full incorporation of existing zoochory data into dispersal databases, and more empirical research into the relationship between plant traits and the frequency and effectiveness of different dispersal mechanisms (paying attention to unexpected vectors). Acknowledging the broad role of non‐frugivores in facilitating LDD is crucial to improve predictions of the consequences of global change, such as how plant distributions respond to climate change, and how alien plants spread. Networks of dispersal interactions between these vertebrates and plants are a vital but understudied part of the Web of Life.

Highlights

  • Seed dispersal is a key aspect of plant population ecology promoting escape from high mortality around the parent plant, and allowing offspring to reach suitable habitat, including previously unoccupied patches

  • Research into dispersal of vascular plants has boomed in recent decades, and has been dominated by a scientific paradigm in which the means of dispersal is predictable from morphological diaspore traits, allowing the definition of ‘morphological dispersal syndromes’

  • We call this the ‘dispersal syndrome paradigm’ (DSP). This paradigm has been further reinforced by the explosive interest in functional traits, since syndromes can be used as such a trait in an effort to explain or predict patterns in community ecology (Aslan et al 2019)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Seed dispersal is a key aspect of plant population ecology promoting escape from high mortality around the parent plant, and allowing offspring to reach suitable habitat, including previously unoccupied patches. Research into dispersal of vascular plants has boomed in recent decades, and has been dominated by a scientific paradigm (sensu Kuhn 1996) in which the means of dispersal is predictable from morphological diaspore traits (van der Pijl 1982, PérezHarguindeguy et al 2013, Chen et al 2020), allowing the definition of ‘morphological dispersal syndromes’. We call this the ‘dispersal syndrome paradigm’ (DSP). These plants may be regularly dispersed by zoochory, and be adapted for it

Is the syndrome concept soundly based?
What ungulates and waterbirds have in common as vectors
Improved dispersal databases that incorporate empirical data on zoochory
Laboratory simulations to quantify dispersal potential
Follow the example of frugivore research
Conclusions
Findings
Author contributions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call