Abstract

The relative plant availability of selenate versus selenite depends on the concentrations of competing ions, specifically sulfate and phosphate, respectively. In solution culture, the concentration of phosphate is typically 100- to 1000-fold greater than in soil solution, an artifact that could lead to underestimation of the phytoavailability of selenite. A nutrient solution study was conducted to compare the availability of selenite and selenate to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. cv. Evening Shade) and strawberry clover (Trifolium fragiferrum L. cv. O'Conner) at basal concentrations of SO4 (0.5 mM) and PO4 (2 μM) similar to those found in soil solution. Concentrations up to 5 mM SO4 and 200 μM PO4 allowed quantitative comparison of the efficacy of the competing ions. In both species, selenite was more phytotoxic than selenate, especially for shoot growth. Selenate was less toxic, and tended to preferentially inhibit root growth. Translocation percentages were much higher with selenate (≥84%) than with selenite (≤47%). A 10-fold increase in sulfate decreased uptake from selenate by >90% in both species. In ryegrass, 10-fold increases in phosphate caused 30% to 50% decreases in Se accumulation from selenite, but in clover such decreases only occurred in the roots. Sulfate-selenate antagonisms were thus stronger than phosphate-selenite antagonisms. Nonetheless, conventional nutrient solutions with millimolar phosphate will significantly underestimate Se availability from selenite, and moderate levels of sulfate salinity can inhibit selenate uptake sufficiently to reverse the apparent relative availability of the two forms of Se.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call