Abstract

Recent observations of debris discs, believed to be made up of remnant planetesimals, brought a number of surprises. Debris disc presence does not correlate with the host star's metallicity, and may anti-correlate with the presence of gas giant planets. These observations contradict both assumptions and predictions of the highly successful Core Accretion model of planet formation. Here we explore predictions of the alternative Tidal Downsizing (TD) scenario of planet formation. In TD, small planets and planetesimal debris is made only when gas fragments, predecessors of giant planets, are tidally disrupted. We show that these disruptions are rare in discs around high metallicity stars but release more debris per disruption than their low [M/H] analogs. This predicts no simple relation between debris disc presence and host star's [M/H], as observed. A detected gas giant planet implies in TD that its predecessor fragment was not disputed, potentially explaining why DDs are less likely to be found around stars with gas giants. Less massive planets should correlate with DD presence, and sub-Saturn planets ($M_{p} \sim 50 \M_{\oplus}$) should correlate with DD presence stronger than sub-Neptunes ($M_{p} \leq 15 \M_{\oplus}$). These predicted planet-DD correlations will be diluted and weakened in observations by planetary systems' long term evolution and multi-fragment effects neglected here. Finally, although presently difficult to observe, DDs around M dwarf stars should be more prevalent than around Solar type stars.

Highlights

  • Introduction1.2 Metallicity correlation challenges1.1 Planet debris and the classical scenarioAsteroids, comets and minor bodies in the Solar System are remnants from the planet formation era (see Johansen et al 2014, for a recent review)

  • 1.2 Metallicity correlation challenges1.1 Planet debris and the classical scenarioAsteroids, comets and minor bodies in the Solar System are remnants from the planet formation era

  • As solid cores reach the critical mass of ∼ 10M⊕, they start to accrete gas (Mizuno 1980; Stevenson 1982; Rafikov 2006), which culminates in the emergence of gas giant planets (e.g., Pollack et al 1996; Ida & Lin 2004a; Hubickyj, Bodenheimer & Lissauer 2005)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.2 Metallicity correlation challenges1.1 Planet debris and the classical scenarioAsteroids, comets and minor bodies in the Solar System are remnants from the planet formation era (see Johansen et al 2014, for a recent review). Solid debris is detected around a good fraction of nearby Solar type stars (Wyatt 2008) through thermal emission by grains in infra-red (Oudmaijer et al 1992; Mannings & Barlow 1998). These grains should have been blown away rapidly by the stellar radiation pressure. Protoplanetary discs around more metal rich stellar hosts are naturally expected to form more massive planetesimal discs (Ida & Lin 2004b) This results in a more rapid assembly of massive solid cores, and yields more gas giant planets in higher metallicity environments (e.g., Ida & Lin 2004b; Mordasini et al 2009). The expected correlation chain in CA is ”higher [M/H] → more planetesimals → more solid cores → more gas giants”

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.