Abstract

The human pan-tissue epigenetic clock is widely used for estimating age across the entire lifespan, but it does not lend itself well to estimating gestational age (GA) based on placental DNAm methylation (DNAm) data. We replicate previous findings demonstrating a strong correlation between GA and genome-wide DNAm changes. Using substantially more DNAm arrays (n=1,102 in the training set) than a previous study, we present three new placental epigenetic clocks: 1) a robust placental clock (RPC) which is unaffected by common pregnancy complications (e.g., gestational diabetes, preeclampsia), and 2) a control placental clock (CPC) constructed using placental samples from pregnancies without known placental pathology, and 3) a refined RPC for uncomplicated term pregnancies. These placental clocks are highly accurate estimators of GA based on placental tissue; e.g., predicted GA based on RPC is highly correlated with actual GA (r>0.95 in test data, median error less than one week). We show that epigenetic clocks derived from cord blood or other tissues do not accurately estimate GA in placental samples. While fundamentally different from Horvath’s pan-tissue epigenetic clock, placental clocks closely track fetal age during development and may have interesting applications.

Highlights

  • Gestational age (GA) of the fetus is used to forecast the date of delivery, optimize prenatal care, and monitor the growth and development of the fetus relative to other pregnancies

  • We focus on placental DNA methylation (DNAm) data, because prior work demonstrated that accurate estimators of chronological age can be developed based on DNAm levels from a variety of tissues [23], that one can estimate GA based on DNAm data derived from umbilical cord blood samples [24, 25], and most pertinently that one can estimate GA based on placental methylation data (Mayne et al 2017) [17]

  • We aim to develop three different placental epigenetic clocks: 1) a “robust placental clock” (RPC) that is largely unaffected by pregnancy conditions, 2) a “control placental clock” (CPC), tailor-made for measuring GA in normal pregnancies, and 3) a “refined Robust placental clock (RPC)”, trained for uncomplicated term (GA>36) pregnancies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gestational age (GA) of the fetus is used to forecast the date of delivery, optimize prenatal care, and monitor the growth and development of the fetus relative to other pregnancies. Short GA at delivery impacts neonatal morbidity and mortality [1,2,3], as well as brain development [4,5,6]. Accurate classification of the fetus may help predict neonatal risk. In this regard, the World Health Organization defined extremely preterm (

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call