Abstract
On 9 May 2013, the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the cases of Pitt v Holt and Futter v Futter were handed down. Both appeals raised issues about the so-called rule in Hastings-Bass. Pitt v Holt also raised issues as to the court’s jurisdiction to set aside a voluntary disposition for mistake. This article focuses on the judgment insofar as it deals with mistake.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
