Abstract
In animals, recoil motion resulting from underwater propulsion can destabilise trajectory and decrease locomotory performance. The posture of diving seabirds fluctuates simultaneously with their appendage beat, especially in the vertical plane, because of the recoil force of the beat. Seabirds that fly and swim face trade-offs between maximising their locomotory performance in one medium relative to the other, and flightless penguins were hypothesised to have higher underwater pitching stability than alcids that fly and swim. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the in situ pitching stability of three species of diving seabirds, including a penguin, Pygoscelis adeliae, and two species of alcids, Cerorhinca monocerata and Uria lomvia. A high-resolution gyroscope data logger was attached to the back of each bird and recorded the angular velocity of the body during the descent phase of dives. For all three species, the root mean square (RMS) of the angular velocity, which indicated the level of angular fluctuation, was negatively correlated with the depth. Many factors, such as the dorsoventral acceleration resulting from wing beat, dive angle, speed, and current depth, as well as the maximum depth in each dive, significantly affected the angular velocity RMS. The angular velocity RMS at a given depth (e.g. 5 and 10 m) significantly increased with the maximum depth of the dives, suggesting buoyancy regulation relative to the target depth to reduce the destabilising angular momentum in all three species. During entire descent periods, the angular fluctuation was generally lower in P. adeliae than in the two species of alcids, supporting the hypothesis of a higher pitching stability in penguins. Furthermore, the angular fluctuation of U. lomvia was lower than that of C. monocerata at deeper depths, suggesting higher pitching stability and more efficient underwater locomotion in U. lomvia. This study demonstrated a difference in the pitching stability, which is an important component of underwater locomotory efficiency, of a penguin and two alcid species while diving freely in natural conditions. In situ angular fluctuation data obtained by gyroscope would be useful to understand the locomotory strategy of swimming animals.
Highlights
In animals, recoil motion resulting from underwater propulsion can destabilise trajectory and decrease locomotory performance
The angular velocity root mean square (RMS) was significantly negatively correlated with the current depth in all three species (Pearson’s r = −0.44, and p < 0.0001 for ADPE; r = −0.77, and p < 0.0001 for BRGU; r = −0.58, and p < 0.0001 for RHAU)
We showed that (1) Adélie penguins and two species of alcids, rhinoceros auklets and Brünnich’s guillemot, are faced with pitching fluctuation as a recoil force to wing beat, and the magnitude of the fluctuation decreased with diving depth
Summary
Recoil motion resulting from underwater propulsion can destabilise trajectory and decrease locomotory performance. A high-resolution gyroscope data logger was attached to the back of each bird and recorded the angular velocity of the body during the descent phase of dives Many animals use their appendages (legs, wings, flippers, fins, etc.) to displace themselves or to retain their position and posture in a medium. Whereas the appendage usage enables them to achieve displacement or retention, the movement simultaneously produces recoil force [1,2,3,4,5,6] This is especially true in water, where the viscosity (~50 times that of air) and density (~800 times that of air) of the medium are relatively high, and the resulting drag and recoil forces are large.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
