Abstract

World expos are occasions for the type of rhetorical display known as "epideictic," and as such, they provide glimpses into how a nation wants to be seen at a particular point in time. In this article, I probe into Norway’s pavilion at the 1992 expo in Seville, Spain, for answers to what Norway wanted to be in the early 1990s. I will argue that Norway’s pavilion, a “deconstructed structure” that centered on a somewhat ambiguous pipe, signals a country in the process of reinventing itself under the aegis of petroleum. More specifically, I suggest that Norway’s ’92 pavilion can be read as an early instantiation of rhetorical techniques that would later become key to Norway’s claim to being both a leading petroleum producer and an environmental frontrunner. The pavilion itself pulled off this balancing act in much the same way that politicians and others would later learn to handle it – by techniques of rhetorical association and dissociation (Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca 1969 [1958]). Having chosen “the cycle of water” as the overarching theme for the exhibition, the makers of the pavilion (the largest sponsor of which was the state oil company, Statoil) managed to make petroleum safe by renaming it “offshore” and by associating it, also in many other ways, with water. The pavilion’s deconstructive architecture can thus be understood as an early validation of the rhetorical practice of “putting together” and “taking apart” to make new things that serve the nation’s interests – in this case a “cycle of water” in which petroleum was a natural part. Although I posit only similarity, and not causality, the rhetorical techniques of Norway’s ’92 pavilion were in this way strikingly similar to what later became a stock argument, e.g. that Norway offers “the world’s cleanest petroleum” (see Ihlen 2007).

Highlights

  • One does not have to be a radical to acknowledge that the display of riches often, if not always, comes at a cost

  • I will turn my attention to Norway’s pavilion at the 1992 World Expo in Seville, Spain, to understand what this display can tell us about Norway in the early 1990s, and, to poke into the costs and, more broadly, the consequences of what was on display

  • In the moral logic that emerged from the early 1990s onwards, Norway’s petroleum extraction and environmental ambitions were two sides of the same coin

Read more

Summary

By Kristian Bjørkdahl

One does not have to be a radical to acknowledge that the display of riches often, if not always, comes at a cost. A case can be made that a display of riches can only work if the cost is somehow masked, glossed, marginalized, kept in the dark, made invisible This dynamic of display is certainly characteristic of world exhibitions, which, one could argue, make an art form out of selecting what to put forth and what to leave in the dark. Considered as forms of display, world expos are calculated façades, they are outward-facing fronts that intentionally fail to tell us what lurks behind. They are performances, one could say, that produce “strategic ignorance” (Proctor and Schiebinger 2008; McGoey 2019).

Culture Unbound
Cost Accounting
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.