Abstract

Regulatory impact assessment (RIA) is a relatively new tool that has been introduced into the legislative system of the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Slovenia. To streamline its implementation, all three countries have decided to conduct a pilot RIA in a very similar area — administrative burden on enterprises. Although the circumstances and rationale for preparing a pilot RIA differ from country to country, all three struggle with inadequate political support, institutional arrangements and lack of clear methodologies. This paper aims to compare the formal arrangements that have introduced RIA into their national systems and their experience with piloting RIA. It argues that the piloting was kidnapped by the agenda of administrative burden and business-oriented RIA, which served the substantive discussion rather than the potential pedagogical or demonstrative effects that the pilot could have brought.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.