Abstract

In the fourth installment of the column following the self-directed learning curriculum development project at Kanda University of International Studies, Japan, Satoko Watkins, Neil Curry and Jo Mynard detail the process of conducting a pilot of a possible self-directed learning curriculum for freshmen students, that would meet the needs and principles established in the previous two installments. This pilot represents quite a shift for the learning advisors (LAs), as it would bring what has up until now been a largely self-study course into the mainstream classroom environment, taught by LAs. The installment offers an insight into the strengths and potential weaknesses of such a course, and how students responded to it.

Highlights

  • Introduction to the ColumnKatherine Thornton, Otemon Gakuin University, Osaka, JapanIn the fourth installment of the column following the self-directed learning curriculum development project at Kanda University of International Studies, Japan, Satoko Watkins, NeilCurry and Jo Mynard detail the process of conducting a pilot of a possible self-directed learning curriculum for freshmen students, that would meet the needs and principles established in the previous two installments

  • Format refers to how the curriculum would be delivered to the students i.e. as an optional outside class self-study course, as classroom-based content etc. and was the first item that needed to be decided

  • It was decided that the curriculum should be piloted with one Freshman English class over the course of the first semester, which involved firstly compulsory in-class input sessions taught by learning advisors (LAs), and secondly an optional outside class self-study supported by LAs

Read more

Summary

Introduction to the Column

In the fourth installment of the column following the self-directed learning curriculum development project at Kanda University of International Studies, Japan, Satoko Watkins, Neil. Curry and Jo Mynard detail the process of conducting a pilot of a possible self-directed learning curriculum for freshmen students, that would meet the needs and principles established in the previous two installments. This pilot represents quite a shift for the learning advisors (LAs), as it would bring what has up until now been a largely self-study course into the mainstream classroom environment, taught by LAs. The installment offers an insight into the strengths and potential weaknesses of such a course, and how students responded to it. ● Re-designing the delivery format, content, sequencing, and assessment ready to pilot

● Conclusions
Effectiveness and learning gains:
Conclusions
Notes on the contributors
Syllabuses should cater for different learning styles and preferences
13. The workload for students should be equal each week
Objectives
Findings
21. Student surveys should be conducted at the end of each course

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.