Pilot Plant Performance Comparing Carbon-Based and Membrane-Based Potable Reuse Schemes

Abstract

Two pilot-scale advanced water treatment plants using tertiary-treated biological nutrient removal wastewater effluent were operated simultaneously to demonstrate and compare treatment performances and process operations. Final effluent from both the plants was compared for its suitability to recharge a potable water supply aquifer. The two treatment approaches included a carbon-based treatment process (flocculation/sedimentation, ozone-biofiltration, granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption, ultraviolet (UV) disinfection; 20,000 L/day) and a membrane-based treatment process (ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, UV-hydrogen peroxide advanced oxidation; 160,000 L/day). Both processes were found to be reliable in producing water that met all United States Safe Drinking Water Act's primary maximum contaminant levels (MCLs). The carbon-based process often exceeded the secondary MCL for total dissolved solids due to background salinity in the source water. Results showed that both systems performed comparably with respect to removal of pathogens, fecal indicators, and contaminants of emerging concern. Total organic carbon (TOC) was removed to below 0.5 mg/L by the membrane-based process. For the carbon-based process, GAC media exhaustion over the course of the pilot operation resulted in an increase in finished water TOC from <0.5 to ∼4 mg/L. Disinfection byproducts, including trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids were not measured above their respective MCL after 8 h of free chlorine contact in a simulated distribution system test. N-nitrosodimethylamine was removed below 10 ng/L by the GAC with 20 min of empty bed contact time after 20,000 bed volumes.