Abstract
Based on some of our earlier dielectric relaxation studies during structural relaxation of molecular glasses, we describe certain features specific to the change in the Johari–Goldstein (JG) relaxation and examine their consequences for understanding of the molecular mechanism of the JG process. The parameter for the distribution of relaxation times increases slightly (loss curve becomes narrower) and the relaxation rate either remains constant or increases on ageing. In all cases, contribution to permittivity from the JG relaxation, Δ ε JG decreases with time, with a rate constant k according to a relation, Δ ε JG ( t) = Δ ε JG ( t → ∞) − [Δ ε JG ( t = 0) − Δ ε JG ( t → ∞)][1− exp[−( kt)]. This reduces to an equation of the type Δε JG ( t) = a + b exp(− kt) where a and b are constants of the glass as well are dependent on the thermal history of quenching of the glassy system. On decreasing the temperature, the relaxation rate for a rigid molecular glass follows the Arrhenius equation in a range that extends from liquid to glass, but deviates from it as a result of structural relaxation of the two alcohols, while the distribution of relaxation times decreases. The variation of Δ ε JG with temperature shows an increase in slope on heating through T g or else a deep and broad minimum before T g is reached and the slope increases are remarkably similar to the changes observed for volume and thermodynamic properties on heating a glass. These findings need to be considered for a molecular mechanism in the potential energy view of JG relaxation, in analyzing the physical ageing of the α-relaxation process. It is argued that a recent suggestion for considering the JG relaxation within the picture of potential energy landscape may not be inconsistent with its molecular origin and dynamics in localized regions of structurally inhomogeneous glass. But there is still need to determine how the apparent dynamic heterogeneity evident from the broad distribution of the JG relaxation times can be reconciled with the dynamic heterogeneity used to explain less-broad spectra of the α − relaxation process.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.