Abstract
Ronquist et al. (1999) recoded Rasnitsyn’s (1988) analysis to effect an explicit numerical cladistic analysis of his data. Here we examine their analysis and reveal that much of the resolution obtained for apocritan relationships is dependant on reductional wing characters. The wing characters in their matrix are replaced with a revised set of wing characters and reanalysed using strict parsimony. For apocritan taxa the resulting strict consensus tree is considerably less resolved, but perhaps preferable as a more conservative starting point in the continuing investigation of higher level hymenopteran relationships.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
