Abstract

Resolution of evolutionary relationships among some monocot orders remains problematic despite the application of various taxon and molecular locus sampling strategies. In this study we sequenced and analysed a fragment of the low-copy, nuclear phytochrome C (PHYC) gene and combined these data with a previous multigene data set (four plastid, one mitochondrial, two nuclear ribosomal loci) to determine if adding this marker improved resolution and support of relationships among major lineages of monocots. Our results indicate the addition of PHYC to the multigene dataset increases support along the backbone of the monocot tree, although relationships among orders of commelinids remain elusive. We also estimated divergence times in monocots by applying newly evaluated fossil calibrations to our resolved phylogenetic tree. Inclusion of early-diverging angiosperm lineages confirmed the origin of extant monocots c. 131 Mya and strengthened the hypothesis of recent divergence times for some lineages, although current divergence time estimation methods may inadequately model rate heterogeneity in monocots. We note significant shifts in diversification in at least two monocot orders, Poales and Asparagales. We describe patterns of diversification in the context of radiation of other relevant plant and animal lineages. © 2015 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, 178, 375–393.

Highlights

  • Molecular phylogenetics has greatly improved our understanding of the evolution of monocotyledoneous plants

  • All trees and the combined data matrix are available on TreeBase; GenBank accession numbers for all included sequences can be found in File S1

  • The final version of the PHYC data set used in this study included 1248 bp (371 aligned amino acids) of exon 1 from 132 taxa; 135 bp representing ambiguous or uninformative gaps were excluded from phylogenetic analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Molecular phylogenetics has greatly improved our understanding of the evolution of monocotyledoneous plants. Graham et al (2006) used relatively few taxa with more loci from only the plastid genome, whereas Chase et al (2006) utilized more comprehensive taxon sampling with fewer loci from plastid, mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. The two most recent and comprehensive molecular phylogenetic studies improved resolution and support for major lineages by pursuing different sampling strategies. Both analyses provided strong support for monophyly of all monocot lineages as defined by APG III (2009). Relationships among orders of commelinids (Poales, Commelinales, Zingiberales, Arecales, Dasypogonaceae) have proven difficult to elucidate (Givnish et al, 1999; Davis et al, 2004; Chase et al, 2006; Graham et al, 2006; Barrett et al, 2013)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call