PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN MODERN LINGUISTICS

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

The development of speech culture and communication processes has been influenced significantly by the evolution of communication itself, marked by the incorporation of stable expressions, phrases, and fixed lexical combinations. This transformation has entailed a reevaluation of content and the author's intended message, particularly within the domain of phraseological units. A pivotal area of inquiry within contemporary linguistics involves the assessment of the quality of phraseological unit usage, the delineation of classification approaches, and the formulation of systematization methods tailored to the stylistic and contextual attributes of these linguistic constructs. This article undertakes an examination of the structural components inherent to phraseological units in modern linguistics. Furthermore, it investigates the intricacies of their semantic structure, their contextual utility, and their applications across diverse modes of communication. The article comprehensively considers the intricacies surrounding the evolution of language and the concurrent emergence of new phraseological units. It also addresses the influence of scientific and technological progress, which contributes to the development of novel forms and categories of phraseological units. The distinctiveness in the formation of phraseological units within various language groups can be attributed to a combination of factors, including folk traditions, the written cultural legacy, the creative endeavours of the populace, and the transformation of cultural paradigms. Furthermore, the article emphasizes the significance of systematizing phraseological units, with an emphasis on achieving a qualitative categorization of the most prevalent lexical constructions within the respective language groups under consideration. This article undertakes an in-depth examination of the mechanisms responsible for the generation of phraseological units, as well as the distinctive characteristics in comparing such units across diverse language groups. It also incorporates a comprehensive semantic analysis aimed at elucidating the content and avenues for reinterpretation inherent to phraseological units.