Abstract

The hypothesis that phototropism applies to entire trees as well as to apical meristems was tested. The hypothesis was correct but with important modifications: (1) canopy emergent species exhibit very little phototropic response; (2) streamside species exhibit significantly more response than upland species. Costs and benefits of learning are shown to provide an evolutionary explanation for these differences. Extrapolation of the cost/benefit model yields predictions about what habitats are likely to select for phototropic response.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.