Abstract

ABSTRACTThe phototransparency and water vapor sorption properties of ABA‐type triblock copolymer membranes derived from 4,4‐(hexafluoroisopropylidene) diphthalic anhydride‐2,3,5,6‐tetramethyl‐1,4‐phenylenediamine (PI) and poly(2‐methyl‐2‐adamantylmethacrylate) (PMAdMA) were investigated, with focus on the effect of the adamantane component. The phototransparency of PMAdMA‐block‐PI‐block‐PMAdMA [Block(PI/PMAdMA)] was about 10–20% higher than that of poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐PI‐block‐Poly(methylmethacrylate) [Block(PI/PMMA)] because the high symmetric structure of adamantane inhibited photoabsorbance. The water vapor solubility of Block(PI/PMAdMA) decreased with increased PMAdMA because the PMAdMA had a hydrophobic property. Interestingly, in all relative‐pressure regions, Block(PI/PMAdMA) with the least PMAdMA content showed a higher solubility coefficient than PI because the high mobility of PMAdMA in Block(PI/PMAdMA) resulted in additional sorption sites in the PI segment. A comparison of Block(PI/PMAdMA) with Block(PI/PMMA) in terms of relative pressure at the beginning of clustering further revealed that cluster formation in Block(PI/PMAdMA) was inhibited compared with Block(PI/PMMA) because bulky structure of adamantane restricted the mobility of the polymer main chain. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43795.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.