Photon-Counting Detector CT Versus Energy-Integrating Detector CT of the Lumbar Spine: Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality.

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT could be useful to help address the typically high radiation doses of conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT of the lumbar spine. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare PCD CT and EID CT of the lumbar spine, both performed using tin filtration, in terms of radiation dose and image quality. METHODS. This study included a prospective sample of 39 patients (22 men, 17 women; mean age, 27.2 years) who underwent investigational PCD CT of the lumbar spine as part of a separate study and a retrospective sample of 39 patients (22 men, 17 women; mean age, 34.9 years) who underwent clinically indicated EID CT of the lumbar spine. In both groups, all examinations were performed using unenhanced technique with tin prefiltration between June 2022 and January 2023. Patients were matched between groups using age, sex, and BMI. A custom gaussian curve-fitting algorithm was used to automatically calculate image noise, SNR, and CNR for each examination, on the basis of all voxels within the image set. Three radiologists independently reviewed examinations to perform a subjective visual assessment of visualization of trabecular architecture, cortical bone, neuroforaminal content, paraspinal muscles, and intervertebral disk, as well as overall image quality, using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 4 = excellent). PCD CT and EID CT examinations were compared. RESULTS. Mean CTDIvol was 4.4 ± 1.0 (SD) mGy for PCD CT versus 11.1 ± 1.9 mGy for EID CT (p < .001). Mean size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) was 6.2 ± 1.0 (SD) mGy for PCD CT versus 14.2 ± 1.8 mGy for EID CT (p < .001). PCD CT and EID CT examinations were not significantly different in terms of image noise or SNR (both p > .05). PCD CT, in comparison with EID CT, showed significantly higher CNR (mean ± SD, 33.6 ± 3.3 vs 29.3 ± 4.1; p < .001). For all three readers, the median score for overall image quality was 4 (range, 3-4) for both PCD CT and EID CT. PCD CT and EID CT examinations showed no significant difference in terms of any qualitative measure for any reader (all p > .05). CONCLUSION. PCD CT, in comparison with EID CT, yielded significantly lower radiation dose with preserved image quality. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support expanded use of PCD CT for lumbar spine evaluation.