Abstract
Several Brucella isolates have been described in wild-caught and “exotic” amphibians from various continents and identified as B. inopinata-like strains. On the basis of epidemiological investigations conducted in June 2017 in France in a farm producing domestic frogs (Pelophylax ridibundus) for human consumption of frog's legs, potentially pathogenic bacteria were isolated from adults showing lesions (joint and subcutaneous abscesses). The bacteria were initially misidentified as Ochrobactrum anthropi using a commercial identification system, prior to being identified as Brucella spp. by MALDI-TOF assay. Classical phenotypic identification confirmed the Brucella genus, but did not make it possible to conclude unequivocally on species determination. Conventional and innovative bacteriological and molecular methods concluded that the investigated strain was very close to B. microti species, and not B. inopinata-like strains, as expected. The methods included growth kinetic, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, RT-PCR, Bruce-Ladder, Suis-Ladder, RFLP-PCR, AMOS-ERY, MLVA-16, the ectoine system, 16S rRNA and recA sequence analyses, the LPS pattern, in silico MLST-21, comparative whole-genome analyses (including average nucleotide identity ANI and whole-genome SNP analysis) and HRM-PCR assays. Minor polyphasic discrepancies, especially phage lysis and A-dominant agglutination patterns, as well as, small molecular divergences suggest the investigated strain should be considered a B. microti-like strain, raising concerns about its environmental persistence and unknown animal pathogenic and zoonotic potential as for other B. microti strains described to date.
Highlights
IntroductionHost preference and pathogenicity, the taxonomy of the Brucella genus (http://www.bacterio.net/brucella.html) currently identifies 12 species split into (i) “core” Brucella species, including the six “classical” species (Brucella melitensis, B. abortus, B. suis, B. canis, B. ovis, B. neotomae; http://www.oie.int/fr/normes/code-terrestre/acces-en-ligne/, B. ceti and B. pinnipedialis isolated from marine mammals [1, 2], and the recently describedBrucella Microti-Like From FrogsB. papionis from baboons [3], and ii) the emerging atypical Brucella species [4,5,6]
Based on bacteriological features, host preference and pathogenicity, the taxonomy of the Brucella genus currently identifies 12 species split into (i) “core” Brucella species, including the six “classical” species (Brucella melitensis, B. abortus, B. suis, B. canis, B. ovis, B. neotomae; http://www.oie.int/fr/normes/code-terrestre/acces-en-ligne/, B. ceti and B. pinnipedialis isolated from marine mammals [1, 2], and the recently describedBrucella Microti-Like From FrogsB. papionis from baboons [3], and ii) the emerging atypical Brucella species [4,5,6]
Detection of a Presumptive Brucella Field Isolate From the Domestic Frog P. ridibundus In June 2017, epidemiological investigations were conducted for research purposes on a frog farm in France breeding the first domesticated strain of P. ridibundus Rivan92 R, selected by the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) for human consumption
Summary
Host preference and pathogenicity, the taxonomy of the Brucella genus (http://www.bacterio.net/brucella.html) currently identifies 12 species split into (i) “core” Brucella species, including the six “classical” species (Brucella melitensis, B. abortus, B. suis, B. canis, B. ovis, B. neotomae; http://www.oie.int/fr/normes/code-terrestre/acces-en-ligne/, B. ceti and B. pinnipedialis isolated from marine mammals [1, 2], and the recently describedBrucella Microti-Like From FrogsB. papionis from baboons [3], and ii) the emerging atypical Brucella species [4,5,6]. Brucella infections have been described in wild-caught and captive-bred anuran species native to Africa, South and Central America, and Australia, from animals showing systemic or localized infections [16,17,18,19,20,21,22], as well as, from other apparently healthy individuals [23]. These exotic frog strains are affiliated with the atypical Brucella group, genetically close to B. inopinata [24], [18]
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have