Abstract

There is a renewed interest in magnesium alloys in the automotive industry. Magnesium alloys are ~35% lighter than aluminum and ~80% lighter than steel. As a result, incorporation of magnesium alloy castings in new vehicles plays a critical role in reducing the overall vehicle weight and increasing the vehicle’s fuel efficiency. Magnesium alloys processed via permanent mold casting (PMC) show a high susceptibility to hot tearing. While several techniques are used to relieve hot tearing (e.g., preheating of molds, grain refinements or elimination of sharp features in part design), the underlying mechanisms responsible for hot tearing remain unclear. In the case of magnesium alloys, limited work has been carried out to advance the fundamental understanding of hot tearing. This research investigated the influence of alloy microstructure, casting solidifications and casting stresses on the onset of hot tearing in AZ91D and AE42 magnesium alloys. A novel approach to determine casting stresses using neutron diffraction was implemented. A custom design permanent mold was used to manipulate the cooling rate of a casting and enusing susceptibility to hot tearing. The results indicate that the mold temperature had a profound influence on the nucleation of hot tears. When the cooling rate of AZ91D casting reached ~15.1 °C/s (210 °C mold temperature), the fraction solids development was sufficiently fast to prevent adequate long-range interdendritic feeding of the casting. As a result, shrinkage porosity formed. Shrinkage porosity forming at a location of a stress concentration provided a nucleation site for a hot tear. The stress required to open a shrinkage pore into a hot tear at the stress concentration was ~8 – 12 MPa. Increasing the mold temperature of 250 °C decreased the cooling rate, improved interdendritic feeding of the casting, decreased solidification shrinkage and decreased the magnitude of tensile stresses developing in the casting. In the case of the AE42 alloy, interdendritic feeding of liquid was hindered by the A1xREY intermetallic compounds blocking the interdendritic paths. Further, the presence of acicular A111RE3 phase pinning the grain boundaries decreased the ductility of the AE42 alloy. As a result, a very slow casting cooling rate (~ 7.7 °C/s) was required to prevent the nucleation of hot tears. For higher cooling rates, hot tears nucleated at locations of stress concentrations and propagated along interdendritic regions and grain boundaries.

Highlights

  • When a casting solidifies within a rigid mold, as in the case of high-pressure die-casting (HPDC) or permanent mold casting (PMC) process, the casting’s solidification shrinkage and thermal contraction are hindered by the rigid mold and, mechanical stresses develop in the material

  • It is generally accepted [1] that when the combined stress due to the thermal and mechanical loads exceeds the tensile strength of a semi-solid alloy, fragmentation of the dendritic network occurs, leading to the formation of microcracks and subsequent material failure

  • In order to accurately investigate the evolution of the mechanical response of an alloy between the liquidus and solidus temperatures, a series of tests must be performed at various temperatures

Read more

Summary

Chapter 1 – Introduction

There is a renewed interest in magnesium alloys in the automotive industry. Magnesium alloys are ~35% lighter than aluminum alloys and ~80% lighter than steel. When a casting solidifies within a rigid mold, as in the case of HPDC or PMC process, the casting’s solidification shrinkage and thermal contraction are hindered by the rigid mold and, mechanical stresses develop in the material. It is generally accepted [1] that when the combined stress due to the thermal and mechanical loads exceeds the tensile strength of a semi-solid alloy, fragmentation of the dendritic network occurs, leading to the formation of microcracks and subsequent material failure.

Chapter 2 – Literature Review
Alloy Solidification
Interdendritic feeding
Interdendritic separation of the liquid phase
Interdendritic bridging and solid feeding
Mechanical Behavior of Semi-solid Alloys
Tensile Strength of Semi-solid Alloys Prokhorov and
Ductility of Semi-solid Alloys
Hot Tearing
Factors Affecting Hot Tearing
Assessment of Hot Tearing
Ring Mold Test
In-Situ Test
Hot Tearing Criterion Functions and Predictive Models
Software Modeling of Hot Tearing
Chapter 3 – Theory of Neutron Diffraction
Neutron Sources
Neutron Diffraction
Measurement of Residual Strains and Stresses via Neutron Diffraction
Chapter 4 – Experimental Procedure
Permanent Mold Design
Mold Mounting
Mold Coating
Casting and Mold Temperature Measurement
Alloy Melting and Casting
Determination of Hot Tear Onset Conditions
E3 Triple Axis Spectrometer
Shaping of the Neutron Beam
Selection of Crystallographic Reflections
Selection of Samples for Strain Mapping via ND Analysis
Selection of Samples for Residual Strain-retention Tests and Texture Analysis
Stress Free Samples
Statistical Treatment of Diffraction Data
Peak width
Selection of Neutron Beam Monitor Values
4.4.10 DSCAN Program
Microscopy
MAGMASOFT® Simulations
Fraction of Solids Model
Mechanical Testing
Chapter 5 – Experimental Results and Discussion
General Observation of the Castings
Visual Inspection of Specimens for Microscopy
AZ91D Hot Tearing Susceptibility Index The HSI values calculated via
Microscopic Analysis
AZ91D Casting at 210 °C Mold Temperature
AZ91D Casting at 250 °C Mold Temperature
AE42 Casting at 340 °C Mold Temperature
AE42 Casting at 390 °C Mold Temperature
Alloy Microstructure
LOM - General Microstructure AZ91D Castings Micrographs in
Morphology of Second Phases
Casting Porosity
Thermal Analysis
Solidification Characteristics of AZ91D and AE42 Alloys
Estimation of Alloy Mechanical Response in the Semi-Solid State
Retention of Residual Strains Four samples presented in
Residual Strain in x-Direction
Residual Strain in y-Direction
Residual Strain in z-Direction
Texture Analysis
Residual Stress in AZ91D Castings
Interactive Effects
Effect of PMC Process Parameters on Hot Tearing
Effect of PMC Process Parameters on the Formation of Casting Defects
Fundamental Mechanisms Influencing Hot Tearing in Magnesium Alloys
Effect of Alloy Microstructure
Effect of Cooling Rate
Effect of Stress and Strain
Chapter 6 – Conclusions
Chapter 7 – Recommendations for Future Work
Software Overview
Mathematical and Physical Models of Simulation
Standard material properties
Solid casting contraction
A1.3.10.2 Casting Filling Velocity 273
A1.3.10.3 Casting Solidification Temperature 278
A1.3.10.4 Prediction of Hot Tear Evolution 284
A1.3.10.5 Casting Displacement 292
Findings

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.