Abstract

This paper discusses the effect of a long neck tube inserted between the reservoir and the pulse tube hot end. To improve pulse tube performance, the pulse tube enthalpy flow divided by the regenerator mass flow needs to be maximized. From the view point of the equivalent PV diagram at the cold end of the pulse tube, the optimum performance will be given by the PV shape of the idealized Stirling cycle. However, in the case of the orifice pulse tube, the phase shift effect generated by the orifice and reservoir is not sufficient. The double inlet pulse tube can approach the PV shape of the idealized Stirling cycle, but this configuration requires additional work input. The computer simulation developed in this study indicates that a long neck tube with a reservoir, instead of the orifice and the double inlet, gives an improved PV diagram with no additional work.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.