Pharmacy professionals’ views regarding the future of NHS patient medicines helpline services: A multimethod qualitative study

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Patient medicines helpline services (PMHS) have been established at some National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England, to provide medicines-related support to recently discharged hospital patients and carers. However, findings suggest that, due to a lack of resources, considerable variation exists in the operation of PMHS, and that their access, availability, and promotion do not meet national standards regarding helpline provision (1, 2). To develop recommendations for service improvement, this qualitative study sought to examine pharmacy professionals’ views regarding the future of PMHS. Aim To examine pharmacy professionals’ perceptions of the future of PMHS, and develop recommendations for service improvement. Methods University ethics and Health Research Authority approval were obtained before commencement. Participants comprised pharmacy professionals from acute, mental health, specialist, and community NHS Trusts that provided a PMHS. Invitations to participate in an online qualitative survey and subsequent semi-structured telephone interview were sent via email to pharmacy services at all Trusts that provided a PMHS. Within the survey and the interview schedule was one question “How do you see patient medicines helplines at NHS Trusts developing in the future?” and only the data generated from this open-ended question were analysed for this study. Survey data were collected via SurveyMonkey (n=100). Individuals interested in participating in an interview contacted the research team, resulting in 34 interviews. Interviews were conducted from May-October 2018, and ranged from 16 to 53 minutes. Braun and Clarke’s inductive reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Guidelines for enhancing the validity and trustworthiness of qualitative research were used. Results Two themes were generated from the survey and interviews. Enhancing value for service users identifies suggestions for improving the value of PMHS for service users. These include providing access methods beyond the telephone, and providing patients/carers with post-discharge follow-up calls from a pharmacist. Improving efficiency identifies that, in the future, and in line with NHS plans for efficiency and shared resources, PMHS may become centralised or provided by community pharmacies. Centralised services were considered to likely have more resources available to provide a patient medicines information service compared to hospital pharmacies. Participants often referred to the Carter report and sustainability and transformation plans, which promote the sharing of resources within regions. However, such a change was perceived to only increase efficiency if patient information can be shared between relevant healthcare settings. Conclusion PMHS are perceived by pharmacy professionals as likely to become centralised in the future (i.e., provided regionally or nationally) or provided by community pharmacies. This is dependent upon patients’ information being shared between hospitals and the centralised PMHS or pharmacies. To enhance the value of PMHS for service users, providers could establish other methods of access, such as email and video consultation. A limitation of this study is that it did not seek the perspectives of pharmacy professionals who do not provide a PMHS, other healthcare professionals, nor patients and carers. Considering the uncertainty around the future of PMHS, research should establish the best way to support all patients and carers regarding medicines following hospital discharge.