Developing paediatric skills and knowledge in pharmacy education: an exploration of a novel work-based learning experience

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Pharmacy education in the United Kingdom must adapt to produce independent prescribing pharmacists ready to join an evolving healthcare system. Current placement practices exclude approximately 21% of the population due to a lack of specific recommendations surrounding paediatric experience and knowledge within the MPharm programme.[1] In turn, students’ current experiences may be limited by lack of interaction with unique learning outcomes offered by some healthcare settings, such as paediatric hospitals.[2] To promote student exposure in an overlooked speciality, novel approaches to work-based learning can be utilised. Aim This study aimed to explore pharmacy students’ experiences of work-based learning in a paediatric hospital setting. Methods In October 2022, fourth-year MPharm students at one school of pharmacy were invited to undertake work-based learning sessions across one academic year. The sessions aimed to develop students’ paediatric consultations skills and knowledge. Sessions consisted of a briefing, ward activities, scaffolded consultations with children and carers, and debriefs with a clinical supervisor. Debriefs included students reporting clinical information, required action and learning outcomes. All debriefs provided by students were transcribed by a clinical supervisor using a spreadsheet which recorded the date, ward visited, patient details, student handover, follow-up (if required) and learning outcomes. Data was initially cleaned, quality checked, and underwent content analysis to identify patterns and key themes to describe student experiences. Results Seventy-four students took part in sessions and delivered 233 consultations covering the medical history of the patient (76%, n=177), with varied levels of completeness. Students were exposed to acute conditions (41%, n=96) and chronic conditions (33%, n=76), with 13% (n=30) still awaiting diagnosis. Forty-eight percent (n=81) of learning points related to the pathology, diagnosis and symptoms of conditions, 24% (n=41) to medicines, 15% (n=25) to patient care, 11% (n=18) to non-clinical experiences and 2% (n=4) to other outcomes. In addition to carrying out ward activities, students underwent the processing of experiences during post-session debriefs: “It’s uncomfortable seeing a child struggle to breathe” [P131]. The process of active reflection was also evidenced in debriefs: “I felt very anxious, like a tightness in the chest, to hear that a child had a short life expectancy” [P145]; “I realised they had zero cultural competence after seeing a patient from the Middle East with jaundice” [P233]. Conclusion The study demonstrates a proof of concept that students can be exposed to complex care needs and challenging consultations under indirect supervision, demonstrating the paediatric setting to be a suitable work-based learning host. However, findings are limited to a single cohort of students at a single site, meaning transferability may be limited. Future studies could focus on longitudinal educational and emotional outcomes of students by measuring clinical knowledge, competence and confidence. Utilising post-session debriefs with peers and supervisors created a space to share both pharmaceutical and emotional learning points, aiding in managing the cognitive load of students. This experience not only highlights the requirement of paediatric exposure in pharmacy education programmes to aid the students’ future practice, but the importance of supervised reflective activities following work-based learning experiences.