Abstract

The examples discussed demonstrate the importance of stereoselective drug metabolism and raise the question of whether the therapeutic use of racemic drugs is still justified. There is no straightforward answer to this question. If only quantitative differences in therapeutic activity exist and the less active enantiomer is not predominantly responsible for side effects, the therapeutic benefit gained by using the more active enantiomer is only marginal and does not justify the substantial increase in costs involved in manufacturing such a drug preparation. However, if stereoselectivity in therapeutic activity is pronounced and adverse drug reactions are caused mainly by the less active isomer then an isomeric pure drug preparation should be used.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.