PF518 SOMATIC COPY NUMBER GAINS IN MYC, BCL2, OR BCL6, IN ADDITION TO TRANSLOCATIONS, IDENTIFIES A SUBSET OF AGGRESSIVE ALTERNATIVE‐DH/TH DLBCL PATIENTS

Abstract

Background:Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is characterized by both biologic and genetic heterogeneity. While significant therapeutic advances have been made, nearly 30% of cases fail frontline treatment. Recent data suggest that 5–10% of DLBCL can be categorized as double/triple hit lymphoma (DH/TH), defined as having concurrent MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 gene rearrangements, identified by fluorescence in‐situ hybridization (FISH) probes. According to the 2017 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms, DH/TH DLBCL is now considered a high grade B‐cell lymphoma (HGBL). While gene rearrangements represent significant genetic events in cancer, copy number alterations (CNAs) also play an important role, often through genomic amplification of oncogenes or loss of tumor suppressors. Despite their similarities, the contributions of CNAs in MYC, BCL2, and BCL6, alone, or in combination with gene rearrangements, are largely unknown in DLBCL and could identify a group of previously uncharacterized patients that may have high expression of MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 driven by alternative mechanisms.Aims:The goal of the study is to define the landscape and prognostic significance of gene rearrangements and copy gains in MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 in a cohort of newly diagnosed DLBCL.Methods:A total of 176 cases of DLBCL with both FISH and CNA data were available for the study. FISH was performed on formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded sections using break‐apart probes to MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 in the Mayo Clinic Department of Lab Medicine and Pathology. Somatic copy number alterations were identified using whole exome sequencing and the Affymetrix OncoScan® FFPE assay on patient tumor FFPE tissue, and were interrogated using Nexus Copy Number 9.0 software. All patients were treated with immunochemotherapy and prospectively followed for event‐free and overall survival.Results:FISH identified 3 groups of previously described patients, DH/TH or HGBL (n = 11), translocation positive (single MYC, BCL2, BLC6, or double BCL2/BLC6, n = 86), and translocation negative (n = 79). Expanding upon the translocation positive subgroup, copy number analysis identified patients (19 of 86, 22%) with copy number gains in a second or third gene resulting in genomic hits at both MYC and BCL2/6; we classified these as alternative‐double/triple‐hit (A‐DH/TH). An example of this would be a MYC translocation plus a BCL2 and/or BCL6 gain (n = 5), or a BCL2 and/or BCL6 translocation plus a copy gain in MYC (n = 14). Similar interrogation of a publically available dataset (n = 250), revealed similar proportions of these patient groups in an independent cohort of DLBCL, validating our findings. Cell of origin classification of the A‐DH/TH cases revealed that they were 53% GCB. A‐DH/TH patients, in comparison to the translocation‐positive/copy‐gain‐negative cases, were at greater risk of an event (Cox HR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.71–3.0) and the cases trended towards a worse overall survival (log‐rank P = 0.065; Cox HR = 2.0, 95% CI = 0.94–4.3). Patients with copy‐gains alone had similar outcomes as those with no copy‐gain or translocations, suggesting a central role for at least one translocation event in predicting outcome.Summary/Conclusion:Our data suggest that use of CNA data in combination with traditional FISH can identify a unique subset of DLBCL, A‐DH/TH, that are missed by standard clinical practice. More importantly, we find that these patients do poorly and may benefit from more aggressive treatment, although we do acknowledge that our population size was small and further validation is needed.image