Abstract
A well-planned field data collection program should be designed to (1) collect a sufficient set of data of the right types at the right locations, and (2) collect a parsimonious set of data to avoid unnecessary costs. Combining PEST and a simple analytic element method (AEM) groundwater flow model for the site of interest provides a relatively simple, low-cost method of developing such a program. AEM models are well suited to this approach because they are quick to develop yet hydraulically accurate, reducing impacts on project budgets at early data collection planning stages; and quick to run, solving rapidly for the many iterations that PEST requires to generate good parameter estimates. This article shows two examples of this method: one for a steady state watershed model, and one for a transient pumping test project to demonstrate that PEST coupled with a simple AEM model that sketches out the key features of a site conceptual model can be an efficient tool in planning key parts of a hydrogeologic site investigation.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have